Felix Gill vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gill vs Wong analysis and find out who is favored!
Felix Gill vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gill 2 - 0 Wong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gill has won 52.46% of points on his second serve, while Wong has won 48.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gill, in recent form, has won 52.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 47.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.29% and 30.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gill has saved 60.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 60.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gill has won 65.85% of matches played (W/L 54/ 28), with Wong winning 63.16% (W/L 48/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 112/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 80/ 57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Gill has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.29% of matches (W/L 28/ 13), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gill winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gill winning 4 and Wong winning 1. The last match between Gill and Wong was at the Pune Challenger, 20-02-2024, First, Hard with Felix Gill getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gill and Wong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gill winning 1 times and Wong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gill winning 1, and Wong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gill has played against opponents with an average rank of 261.93 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 253.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gill has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gill has converted 45.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 33.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
311
Rank
306
High
21
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
181
Rank
180
High
19
Age
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
62% (139-87)
Career Total W/L
56% (101-78)
62% (21-13)
YTD W/L
42% (10-14)
$25,500
Career Prize Money
$23,250
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Felix Gill | Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 29 | 23 |
Aces (Total) | 14 | 18 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:47:6 | 1:47:6 |
1st Serve % | 65% (102/156) | 63% (88/140) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (79/102) | 77% (68/88) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (30/54) | 44% (23/52) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 25% (3/12) |
Return Points W% | 35% (49/140) | 30% (47/156) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 |
Felix Gill
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
6
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
41 of
48)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
29 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
Felix Gill
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Felix Gill | Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (21/13) | 42% (10/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 61% (49/31) | 46% (26/31) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (398/346) | 48% (279/298) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 48% (10/11) |
Clay Win/Loss | 61% (17/11) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.57 |
Aces Total | 95 | 162 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.25 |
DFs Total | 86 | 72 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:48 | 1:50:56 |
Avg Opp Rank | 269.5 | 344.67 |
1st Serve % | 61% (1455/2370) | 55% (1027/1857) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (983/1455) | 72% (742/1027) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (480/915) | 48% (396/830) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (112/248) | 35% (57/165) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (975/2378) | 38% (708/1888) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 62% (21/13) | 45% (9/11) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (21/34) | 42% (10/24) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 67% (6/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 42% (5/12) | 33% (3/9) |
1st set W, W | 87% (23/20) | 73% (11/8) |
1st set W, L | 13% (23/3) | 27% (11/3) |
1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 15% (13/2) |
Felix Gill Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Felix Gill
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Felix Gill
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Felix Gill
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felix Gill
Player
Mohamed Safwat
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
37%
(
15 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Felix Gill
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Felix Gill
Player
Mathias Bourgue
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Felix Gill
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felix Gill
Player
Jan Hrazdil
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Felix Gill
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Felix Gill
Player
Robert Strombachs
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Andres Andrade
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Remy Bertola
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Moez Echargui
49%
(
54 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Blake Ellis
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more